
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
Convening Panel
Affiliations
Professor Emeritus, Christian Ethics and Practical Theology, University of Edinburgh.
Honorary Professor, School of Divinity, University of St. Andrews
Emeritus Student & Canon of Christ Church, Oxford.
Biography
Oliver O’Donovan, born in 1945 in London, was educated at Balliol College and Wycliffe Hall, Oxford, and at Princeton University, and was ordained priest in Oxford in 1972. He was Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology and Canon of Christ Church Oxford (1982-2006), before which he taught at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford (1972-7) and at Wycliffe College, Toronto (1977-82). He was Professor of Christian Ethics and Practical Theology at Edinburgh (2006-12), and has been Honorary Professor of Divinity at St Andrews since 2013. He has written on Augustine, on the theological basis of moral concepts, on contemporary bioethical dilemmas, on political theology and the ethics of war. He has served on the Church of England’s Board for Social Responsibility, Doctrine Commission and Faith and Order Commission, and was recently convenor of the Archbishops’ review of the Crown Nominations Commission. He is a past President of the Society for the Study of Christian Ethics, a Fellow of the British Academy and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. He is married to Joan Lockwood O’Donovan. They live in Scotland and have two sons.
Research Focus
I am presently working on a series of reflections on the relation of love and justice in divine and human action.
GFI Writings
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
The Sovereignty of Love
1. The Love-Command as the Summary of Law # Jesus famously taught (Matthew 22: 37–40 and parallels) that the first command of the law was Deuteronomy 6:4, “You shall love Yhwh your God with all your heart and mind and soul and strength” and the second Leviticus 19:18, “You shall love your nei…
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
The Sovereignty of Love
The Love-Command as a “Fulfilment” The command of love which forms the centrepiece of Jesus’ moral teaching (Mt. 22: 37-40 and parallels) was elicited by a rabbinic discussion that sought to identify a unifying interpretative principle for the requirements of the Torah as a whole. That love “fulfils…
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
The Place of Virtue Theory in Christian Ethics
There was a time in the last century when expansive claims were made for “virtue”. Dissatisfied with a modern ethics that had reduced morality to decision-making, moralists in search of a wider understanding of human morality looked back to Aristotle, and paid special attention to his treatment of v…
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
If New Virtues Can Arise, How Is Any List Canonical?
Jennifer Herdt’s statement is an excellently focused statement of the traditional presentation of the virtues in theological discussion. In putting one or two questions to her, one is putting them to the tradition she has carefully sustained and developed. The impossibility of an exhaustive list of …
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
The Christian Tradition Never Agreed on When Rebellion Is Justified
I am delighted to see Nigel exploring these themes, which run parallel to much of my own work in the last two decades. With his general approach I am in the strongest sympathy, and in raising three questions I hope simply to tease out some of the underlying logic that a two-page summary inevitably g…
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
Flourishing Needs to Connect with 'Beatitudo' or Happiness
The concern to identify a normative concept of flourishing is admirable. There could be more connection made between “flourishing” and the traditional theological discussions of beatitudo, usually rendered “happiness”, sometimes “blessedness”. Such a connection could have the effect of …
Oliver O’Donovan
University of Edinburgh
I Have Profound Difficulties with Wolterstorff on Justice
It will be no news to my friend Nicholas Wolterstorff, I am afraid, that I have profound difficulties with his approach to the topic of justice, since our differences on the topic have in the past appeared in print. The following statements of the disagreement are no more than Summary headings…